Friday, August 27, 2010
The Last Exorcism Ending Review
The Last Exorcism Ending:Until about the last 8 minutes or so, I was really in the last demons. Then it all fell apart in the end, but in such a way that actually kind of interesting to dissect.
Director Daniel Stamm, who previously made a suicide pseudo-necessary death, uses a similar style here, it is interesting that at first feels almost like a Christopher Guest movie (yes, in the first part of the movie is actually very funny) before taking a sharp turn somewhere something about an average of Nowhere, Louisiana, toward a more “Blair Witch-paranormal” find frames “style.
For me, this method was less effective than here, “Blair Witch (who is afraid of me, but I kind of nausea), or paranormal phenomena (which, frankly, scary enough for me, when I looked Slamdance screener him to his room in Park City hotel a few years ago that I made one of my guy friends sleep in the room with me that night – and we both wanted the bathroom light left on).
I think partly why this is so that both “The Blair Witch Project and the Paranormal felt a certain extent, they may actually be” found footage “as they were shot and cut, while the latter feels the demons themselves too clever to be that Faux true feelings. This is still a good movie, though – until the end. But we’ll get to that in a minute.
Last demon starts by introducing us to the Rev. Mark Cotton (Patrick Fabian), a cynical evangelist fundamentalists, who in addition to getting his congregation riled and reaching deep into their wallets every Sunday, performs random exorcism on the side – - a task he believes the same emotional off, with which, say, an engineer-programmer can see sometimes gets the contract by creating a Web site for additional funds. Someone should (read: they believe that their loved one is possessed by a demon), cottonseed provides services to solve their problems (read: he “exorcises” demon, using various methods as old as snake-oil merchants).
Cotton, you see, was trained at the knee of his father’s profession of preaching, since it was just a tiny baby. He never knew any other way, nor are any other options show it (though he notes, with self-deprecating smile, that his skills could be used as well, selling things), and now he’s here with his wife, son and a mortgage to pay, so the same as anyone else, and the preaching work that pays the bills, nothing more.
He sees not as a sermon calling from God, because only then that his work – although he was very convincing in his flock, and not short them on the sale of his passion for the task, but may be false). In this regard, the cotton does not differ from those who bravely does the job they’re stuck in for years or decades, because the account must be paid, and this is the way in which they have chosen to trade time for money.
However, cotton does not mean the goods or used cars, it has a case to the faith of his flock, his faith in both the higher power and what comes after death, as God and the devil (you can not believe one without believing in the other, Subtitle film tells us). Cotton seems to believe in none, but his lack of faith – or perhaps more accurately, his belief that everything he sells his collection every week, one big con – is about to be shaken.
Cotton decided to invite the documentary filmmakers of his last exorcism in order to expose all the secret tricks of casters used in carrying out their hocus-pocus (there is an annular explanation of why he decided to do such a thing, but really, it feels like someone asked: ” And why did he do it? “and someone molded reason).
With documentaries cotton, in short, to reveal the man himself the man behind the green curtain, destroying the faith of believers in demonic possession, opening the “possession”, all in the mind of the victim and exorcising demons is Salon trick. Toward that end, he chooses as his final “client” from the stack exorcism requests on his desk an envelope containing a request for weathering Aid, Louis, the widow of a farmer in rural Louisana, who is afraid of her young daughter was possessed by a demon.
So Cotton and his friends go to the director of rural Louisiana – a superstitious place where people believe in things like witchcraft, satanic cults and demonic possession in such a way that the urban hipster believes in a studio apartment furnised by IKEA, the importance of good coffee and the need for tight jeans: they are part of the landscape of the region, it is impossible to imagine life without them.
If we did not already know, and we believe that it is, the film hammers it home, threw in some interviews with local-men who convince us that all who live in rural Lousiana, or half-crazy and half-stupid, or some combination thereof. In addition, they do not sense of fashion and trends are bad teeth, but they are very funny to listen to and quite easy to feel smug above, such as cotton confirms occasionally nudge-wink in the general direction of the camera.
All this part of the film, incidentally, was very inadequate, there is a hint here and there that you can come, but in a way that hints dropped, for example, in an episode of Scooby Doo, to mislead us, as who the real villain, than in ways that could actually expand and grow our sense of fear and awe. This is the point of the film, on which we should begin to feel that all may not be exactly as cotton is planned, and instead is largely wasted, laughing at the stupid locals who believe in Satan, and UFOs. Oh, those rural people of Louisiana! Are not they a pack of characters? Yee-ha-ha.
We finally get to a remote farm Switzer, Louis (Louis Herthum), his loyal, defensive son Caleb (Caleb Landry Jones) and his sweet – although it may possess one of the minions of Satan – a 16-year-old daughter, Nell (Ashley Bell) and it was here that the film is a sudden transition from pseudo-comic style ala “The Guest” and the company, and in the realm of pseudo-horror. Because Nell … Hu boy.
She is so sweet, so stuttering and shy, so innocent … except when it is not. Cattle keep raising the dead, and Nell continues to wake up with her white, little house on the Prairie-style nightgowns, covered with blood, not knowing what she did at night during sleep. Brother Caleb is protective of his sister (or he?), On the ground trying to escape the preacher and his loyal crew of the camera, it seemed to establish some partnerships with cotton.
Louis, in turn, is distraught about the death of his wife two years ago (she was buried in the yard, I do not think that is legal here in Seattle, but apparently that’s how they behave in a rural Louisiana), and is concerned about how what might be going with her daughter in jthere here and now, and the state of her soul for all eternity (or it’s more than he seems?)
From there, things go rapidly from bad to worse, as cotton is faced with increasing signs that Nell can not be only one case of a mentally ill person who thinks she’s possessed by demons, but actually, in real life, the holy-shit-that – hell-was this an instance of possession of her-gosh minion of hell. And all this, for the most part, done very effectively. Cast of unknowns (required for pseudo-format) gives a good performance overall, bolstered by some pretty impressive turns Patrick Fabian as cotton and Ashley Bell, as Nell. However, there are a few things that keep the demons from the last truly great horror film.
The first problem (which, frankly, the studio could not see a problem at all) solutions, which were apparently made in order to get the coveted PG-13 rating and thus ensure that teens who love horror movies, will be flock to theaters to see this movie. And I get what I really … Why do you want your film be rated R, and cut out all those precious dollars a box, if you can help him? For most of the film, it works just fine, but as the tension ramps, and we have the climax of the film, Stamm pulls back too far, decides some things are too fast, pressing the envelope a little more had been done so much to increase the feeling of really scary .
In 1973, William Friedkin pushed things uncomfortable with the extreme Linda Blair in the Exorcist, with scenes that still make audiences squirm in their seats. If you want to make a film in which the slogan tells you that if you believe in God, you have to believe in the devil, you swear to do better than the devil scary as, well, hell – and too often pulls Stamm ago, when he feels like he should have pulled ahead.
Maybe it was the result of reducing the studio, rather than director’s decision, in which he directly controls, but in any case, there were times when I felt cheated out of my fear of pushing the point that I wanted to look away as I want in a movie horror. In addition, the image on the poster you see outside the multiplex with demonic beautiful girl crawling spiders, as well as on the ceiling? It will not happen – at least not quite so – in the film, which I think is a little marketing trick. If you’re going to market a movie like “Hey, we have extreme demonic possession is going on here!” do not wuss in the final product.
Despite this, pull back, I still find the last demon is very fun and enjoyable (and yes, sometimes even scary) to go, and I was really with what happened to the last 10 minutes or so of the film, when it is simply to hell in a handbasket, and not for the better. However, my reaction to end partly stems from the script I want to stay with Man of God who had lost faith vibe, ala Exorcist, instead, a sharp left turn onto Moderately Stupid, what it does, but it is what it is.
I’m not going to spoil you as just the end of almost all the ruins that came before it, but really, you’re better than just leaving the theater, yet he did not at that point and a much more satisfying ending myself, than what the movie delivers. You do not, I know, but believe me, after sitting until the end you want, like me, that you, and you’ll be mentally pumping his fist producer of the last 10 minutes. So do not say you were not warned.
Nevertheless, despite these shortcomings, I must recommend the latest Exorcist, and give it a positive assessment of the total, because the rest of the film is really well done, and to act as aforesaid, is so strong that I feel obliged to do so. There are things that the film is very intelligent and links as Exorcist, and I think one of my favorite horror movies ever Changeling, and even that seems a little tribute Poltergeist is also one character. There are also some of Rosemary’s Baby mixed there, and undoubtedly other links horror that people are more versed in the genre, which I had not noticed.
performed by Ashley Bell, as Nell rather specatacular – it transfers trusting, confused innocence, all the little girl lost 1 minute and the next, she was smiling slyly at the camera behind cotton with knowing the threat, which will send a shiver your spine. And Fabian, as the preacher-with-crisis-of-faith are great, so convincingly, with cynical charm and AW-hurt about the shell game, he believes that he draws on both his congregation and his clients exorcism, but eventually shaking his loafers as he is forced to confront their own fears.
Last demons not shocker that “The Blair Witch Project was, and is not terribly surprising in the paranormal, but generally does a good job for most of its length runs of tapping into our own fears and sending a shiver of our collective spine, and certainly , feeds much of his work. And in the summer generally weak films, that in itself makes it worth catching … Despite a miserable end.
Labels:
last exorcism,
the last exorcism,
the last exorcism review,
the last exorcism spoiler,
the last exorcism trailer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment